Concepts

Every term, quoted and cited.
The specification controls.

Each concept is defined by a quotation from one of the Core Specifications (01–06), linked to the section it comes from. Definitions are specification-sourced and pending the applicable specification-owner approvals. RSMOne adds explanation, the distinctions between terms and where each one sits in the model. It never adds a competing definition.

READING A CONCEPT

How to read a concept

A concept page answers four questions, always in the same order.

01

What does it mean?

The definition, quoted verbatim from a Core Specification, with its section. The build fails if the quotation drifts from the source.

02

Where does it sit?

Its plane, its state category (Canonical, Derived, Operational or Projection, or contextual where the specification allows more than one) and, for the eleven stages, its place in the canonical progression.

03

What is it not?

The distinctions RSM preserves, each with the section that draws it. Distinctions are recorded on both terms.

04

Where is it governed?

The specification sections that govern it and the pages that explain it.

VIEW 1 · THE CANONICAL PROGRESSION

Eleven stages, in order

CP §10.1. Each stage names the artifact it produces and that artifact's state category. Evidence is not a stage: it supports propositions throughout, and stays distinct from them.

  1. 01IntentCanonical
  2. 02DiscoveryDerived
  3. 03ConfigurationDerived
  4. 04GapDerived
  5. 05PathwayDerived
  6. 06CommitmentCanonical
  7. 07FormationCanonical
  8. 08ActivityCanonical
  9. 09ObservationCanonical
  10. 10OutcomeCanonical
  11. 11BiographyProjection

VIEW 2 · THE THREE PLANES OF ONE ECOLOGY

Planes are views, not partitions

CP §16.1. Evidence and Biography belong to two planes. Terms that cut across all three, such as the state categories, are listed under A–Z.

VIEW 3 · DISTINCTIONS

What each term is not

The distinctions RSM preserves. Each pair is recorded on both concepts and cites the section that draws it.

  • Activity ≠ Outcome

    Activity records what was done; Outcome records an evaluated consequence, so completing an Activity, even exactly as planned, is not evidence that the intended change occurred. 04 §13.2

  • Actor ≠ Subject

    An Actor is the entity responsible for performing the action; a Subject is what that action or expression concerns. 02 §3.2

  • Actor ≠ Participant

    Acting is about responsibility for an action, while participating is about taking part in a bounded context; one Person may be both at once. 01 §3.1

  • Agency ≠ Authority

    Agency is whether an entity can perform an action; Authority is whether it may perform that action in the relevant context. 01 §8.3

  • Assertion ≠ Evaluation

    An Assertion is a conclusion adopted under an authority basis and acceptance boundary; an Evaluation records only that an evaluator applied criteria and obtained a result. 04 §10.6

  • Authority ≠ Capability

    Authority is permission to perform an operation in context; Capability is what an entity can credibly do, and technical ability never implies permission. 04 §20.1

  • Canonical state ≠ Projection

    A Projection is a non-authoritative view assembled from canonical state; it may be stale or incomplete without changing the canonical record it represents. 04 §3.5

  • Canonical state ≠ Derived state

    Derived state is reasoning about canonical inputs; storing it durably for audit or collaboration does not make it canonical. 04 §3.3

  • Canonical state ≠ Operational state

    Operational state organizes work and may reference canonical objects, but it does not become an authority because applications depend on it. 04 §3.4

  • Capability ≠ Capacity

    Capability says what an entity can credibly do; Capacity says how much of it is actually available under stated conditions. 01 §4.3

  • Claim ≠ Observation

    A Claim is a proposition attributed to a source; an Observation records what was perceived or measured, and neither substitutes for the other. 04 §10.6

  • Claim ≠ Evidence

    A Claim is the proposition; Evidence is information that supports or challenges it and remains a distinct record with its own provenance. 04 §10.3

  • Commitment ≠ Intent

    A Commitment converts a possible contribution into accountable obligation; an Intent only expresses a desired future condition and binds no one to contribute to it. 04 §9.1

  • Commitment ≠ Recommendation

    A Commitment is an authoritative act by a participant taking responsibility; a Recommendation is machine reasoning about what might be done and cannot stand in for that act. 01 §6.5

  • Commitment ≠ Formation

    A Commitment establishes one participant's accountable obligation; a Formation establishes the coordinated structure that can emerge once sufficient Commitments, governance and authority are in place. 04 §30.3

  • Configuration ≠ Formation

    A Configuration is derived reasoning about what might work; a Formation records what has actually assembled under sufficient Commitment and governance. 04 §12.2

  • Contextual Role ≠ Domain Type

    A contextual role describes how an entity participates in a particular context; a domain type describes what it is understood to be within a domain. 03 §8.2

  • Contextual Role ≠ Identity

    Roles change across contexts and over time while identity endures, so a role is never a permanent identity attribute. 02 §9.2

  • Domain Type ≠ Foundational Kind

    A domain type specializes what an entity means within a domain without redefining its stable Foundational Kind. 04 §6.3

  • Evaluation ≠ Evidence

    An Evaluation records the application of criteria to inputs and its result; Evidence is among those inputs and is not itself a conclusion. 04 §10.6

  • Evidence ≠ Observation

    Evidence is information used in relation to a proposition; an Observation records what was perceived or measured and may become one source of Evidence. 04 §10.3

  • Formation ≠ Proposal

    A Formation is established through a governed canonical transition; proposing one communicates a prospective arrangement without creating it. 04 §12.2

  • Formation ≠ Recommendation

    A Formation is canonical state created at an establishment boundary; a Recommendation is a derived suggestion with no authority to establish it. 04 §12.2

  • Formation ≠ Formation Readiness

    A Formation exists only once it has been established; Formation Readiness is a derived assessment that conditions appear sufficient, and no readiness score can bypass the establishment boundary. 04 §12.2

  • Formation ≠ Outcome

    A Formation establishes the coordinated structure that can act; an Outcome records the evaluated consequence of what was done, so establishing a Formation is not achieving an Outcome. 04 §30.3

  • Foundational Kind ≠ Identity

    Foundational Kind says what fundamentally different kind of thing an entity is; Identity says which enduring thing it is. 02 §2.1

  • Map ≠ Model

    A Map is a projection or visualization of part of the Model; the Model is the underlying semantics and state from which many maps are produced. 01 §1.1

  • Offer ≠ Seek

    An Offer expresses what a participant is willing to make available; a Seek expresses what it wishes to obtain or make possible. 01 §5.2

  • Participant ≠ Subject

    A Participant takes part in a bounded context; a Subject is merely what an expression concerns, so a watershed a Formation aims to improve is not thereby a Participant. 02 §3.3

VIEW 4 · A–Z

All 54 concepts

Alphabetical, with state category and the section each definition is quoted from.

A
ActivityCanonical04 §13.1
Actor—01 §8.1
Agency—01 §8.3
AssertionCanonical04 §10.6
Authority—04 §20.1
B
BiographyProjection04 §15.1
C
Canonical state—04 §2.3also: canonical, CANONICAL
CapabilityCanonical01 §4.3
CapacityCanonical01 §4.3also: available capacity
ClaimCanonical04 §10.2
CommitmentCanonical04 §11.1also: Conditional Commitment
ConceptRef—03 §6.2also: Concept reference
ConfigurationDerived04 §16.2also: Candidate Configuration
Contextual Role—02 §9.1also: role
D
DemandExpressionCanonical04 §9.4also: demand expression
DependencyContextual04 §16.4
Derived state—04 §3.3also: derived, DERIVED
DiscoveryDerived01 §6.2
Domain Pack—03 §14.1also: Domain Packs
Domain Type—02 §8.1also: domainType
E
EvaluationCanonical04 §10.5
EventCanonical04 §13.3also: Domain Event
EvidenceCanonical04 §10.3
F
Federation—05 §8.1
FormationCanonical04 §12.1
Formation ReadinessDerived04 §16.6
Foundational Kind—01 §3.3also: foundational entity kind
G
GapDerived04 §16.3
I
Identity—02 §1.2also: canonical identity
InstrumentCanonical02 §4.9
Intelligence layer—04 §29.4also: intelligence systems
IntentCanonical04 §9.1
L
Learning—01 §11.3
M
MapProjection01 §19.2also: maps, RSM Map
MaterialCanonical02 §4.8
Model—01 §19.1also: Regenerative Systems Model
O
ObservationCanonical04 §10.1
OfferCanonical04 §9.2
Operational state—04 §3.4also: operational, OPERATIONAL
OutcomeCanonical04 §14.1
P
Participant—02 §3.3
PathwayDerived04 §16.5
PlaceCanonical02 §4.6
Predicate—04 §10.4also: Predicates
Principal—04 §20.2
Projection—04 §3.5also: projections, PROJECTION, projection state
ProposalContextual04 §19.9
R
RecommendationDerived04 §16.6
Regeneration—01 §2.3
RelationshipCanonical04 §7.1
Rhizosphere—01 §2.2
S
SeekCanonical04 §9.3
Semantic Environment—03 §18.3
Subject—01 §3.1